Hi,

I was checking the WHS without Review or Rating page.........
it shows like 1120 sites.

but, for example "Brugge" as well. but it has ratings and reviews?

what is the exact meaning of that page? I have been to plenty on it but I think the list is buggy?

Chris

It isn't. It orders starting by the zero's. I think people are clever enough to draw your their own conclusions from this list. It shows how "difficult" a site is. Brugge is at 1112 so not difficult at all. I think it is nice to know and like to keep it this way, though the title may be misleading. I can alter the intro text a bit

elsslots

Aha! I thought it was simply a list of missing reviews.

anyhow, a list of missing reviews for WHS and TWHS would be great. Just those.
I'm happy to go through some and add photo / my experience for those I was.

If you click on the header 'reviews', it will sort the ones with 0 reviews first.
These are lacking:
1 Mbanza Kongo
2 Salonga National Park
3 Heard and McDonald Islands
4 French Austral Lands and Seas
5 Malpelo
6 Bikini Atoll
7 Ashur
8 Sangha Trinational
9 Taï National Park
10 Petroglyphs of the Mongolian Altai
11 Noel Kempff Mercado National Park
12 Ogasawara Islands
13 Macquarie Island
14 Phoenix Islands
15 Tadrart Acacus
16 Sub-Antarctic Islands
17 Henderson Island
18 Minaret of Jam
19 Uvs Nuur Basin
20 Great Burkhan Khaldun Mountain
21 Babylon

elsslots

Ok those I cannot help. Hope soon with 5 but.......corona.

any TWHS list where it's missing a review?

TWHS missing reviews are about 900, take your pick from https://www.worldheritagesite.org/tentative/list# (where there is no number in the column "Reviews")

Could you add the "Extension" and "Part of WHS" icons for that page too? That would be useful imho.

Also as I've recommended before, maybe have a look through your database for reviews <300 or <400char and check them because something like this isn't useful and I would have neglected it as "already has a review" (no offense to Oompa Loopma):
https://www.worldheritagesite.org/tentative/id/1376
Nan always is in favor for some kind of review template but I'm rather in-between as long as it's not just a line "oh it's so great, I grew up here, you should go see it, bye" like a lot of India "reviews". As much as we want reviews this is quite crappy and useless.

done!

1) I would concur that we should filter out those tiny reviews.
2) Those were mostly anonymous reviews from the past and those... dont work anymore... I think there is a bug @Els ;) I am not sure we count those though anyhow :D ... Key bit, anonymous reviews are bit crappy due to me.
3) Re template: I think everyone can do as they please. With long texts using subtitles can help the reader to find the key bits though...

I had an idea: you could put a side pane with tips and suggestions for how to style a review. Should help and isn't going to force people to use a template.

https://www.worldheritagesite.org/ranking/most+prolific+members

I notice some of us have rated exactly 1 more than visited - is that a specific site that's causing this issue?

Could that be a result of a World Heritage Site like Liverpool being delisted?

Hmm. Will have a look.