I have just noticed Els that the site has lost the "Category" button!! Is there any other way of finding out which WHS are "categorised" as Cultural Landscapes - at least as far as we are aware since there is also no easy way I can find of searching for them on the UNESCO web site.
I remember when we were doing the original "categorisation" a few years ago I used the list of "Cultural Landscape" sites as given by Peter Fowler in "Landscapes for the World". That was published in 2004 and identified those sites inscribed to 2003 which "he" considered "Cultural Landscapes. I say "he considered" because it wasn't always clear from the UNESCO documentation that those sites had been inscribed as "Cultural Landscapes" and the list included a few surprises!
At that time he listed 36 sites and in fact non European sites only accounted for 13 of them.
By 2008 we had identified 48 under the "Category" definition. We recognised then that it was proving very difficult to be absolutely certain which WHS were regarded as "Cultrual Landscapes". See
http://www.worldheritagesite.org/forums/index.php?action=vthread&forum=8&topic=180&pa ge=0#msg811The "concept" as far as WHS is concerned was first raised by UK when it tried unsuccessfully to get the "Cultural Landscape" of the Lake District" inscribed. after some years and various committees/working parties/(jollies!!) UNESCO accepted the idea and The Philippines got the first new inscription with the Rice Terraces and New Zealand got Tongariro redefined as one as I remember it. The poor old Lake District still languishes uninscribed!! But UK did further "stretch" the concept with the successful nomination (in the face of some opposition!) of the Industrial cultural Landscape of Blaenavon.
It would be interesting to see which sites since 2008 were inscribed as such once the flood gates had been opened. I would expect a bit of a reaction against the trend. The Coffee Cultural Landscape of Columbia only just got through!