Or they will continue with a new discussion on World Heritage Capacity Building (Item 6A). So sorry, delegates.

Thank you everyone. for your reporting of this year's sessions.
As usual, so many overrules of ICOMOS and IUCN's recommendations, with just 4 new sites/extensions/ reformulations not approved, out of 32. And still, for those not approved, a D changed for an R for Mongolia. Another NI changed for an I...not particularly a fan of that. But well, that's the politic$ of World Heritage, nothing new regarding that.
Happy for Guinea Bissau and Sierra Leone on their 1st site, Mozambique and Jamaica for their second, Africa in general, China on its 60th, for the inscriptions of sites that I also considered top missing ones and for Brazil reaching 25 (with 5 of them in the state of Minas Gerais).

They updated the WHC page now - it's indeed Peruacu River Canyon:
https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1747

well-spotted Khuft
still it is weird, as the iucn evaluation was for Cavernas do Peruaçu National Park

very late name change and confusing
the amendment that was accepted indeed calls it Peruaçu River Canyon, Brazil

and they kept the other one on the T List , Cavernas do Peruaçu Federal Environmental Protection Area (APA) / Veredas Do Peruaçu State Park
LOL
I will change it on our website too