Re the "non-inclusion" of Ceide Fields and Clonmacnoise among the 6 sites scrutinized for final inclusion in Ireland's revised T List.
I came across this response to a parliamentary question about
Ceide Fields to the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage on June 23 this year -
Question - "
Deputy Alan Dillon asked the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage the reason the Céide Fields lost its place on UNESCO's tentative list for world heritage status, considering its significance as a world-renowned heritage site and its historical evidence of Ireland's first farmers; and if he will make a statement on the matter."
Answer - "
My Department's policy is for applications to be sponsored by the relevant local authority or key stakeholders/landowners in order to ensure continuity throughout the process. This is crucial in order to facilitate public consultation and wider stakeholder engagement, particularly in light of the requirement under UNESCO Operational Guidelines for participatory planning and public consultation...........No application was received in respect of the Céide Fields, in effect removing itself from consideration for inclusion on the current Tentative List, but does not preclude it from being included in future iterations."
and this quote about
Clonmacnoise from an article of 2010
"
Clonmacnoise was first put forward by the Irish Government as a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 2006. Last July a highly charged meeting to discuss the bid descended into an IFA-led walkout as several farmers voiced their concern at the potential restrictions that might be imposed on farmers in the Clonmacnoise area by its inclusion on the list. However, speaking this week, Minister Gormley re-emphasised that "the nomination of any property from the new tentative list for inscription on the World Heritage List will only take place after consultation with relevant stakeholders and interested parties".
So - neither site made an "application" for inclusion in the latest T List. I think we can put it down in both cases to opposition from the "agricultural lobby". When we visited in July 2022 the receptionist at the Ceide Fields visitor Centre confirmed that local opposition meant that it would not be considered.
We were disappointed with the removal of Ceide Fields - it seemed to have a unique story to tell, albeit controversial regarding the origin of the people who were farming there. And Ireland had spent a lot of money fattening it up as pointed out by the Minister - "
Fáilte Ireland, the Office of Public Works and my Department together have invested over 2.6million in a new immersive experience at the Céide Fields visitor centre, which opened last summer that will ensure that the Céide Fields and north Mayo are a must visit destination along the Wild Atlantic Way route."
See
https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2023-06-20/360/